.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Fruit Blog Header.jpg
APPLES - BRAMBLES - CITRUS - GRAPES - NUTS - PAWPAWS - PEARS - PERSIMMONS - STONE FRUITS - STRAWBERRIES - FORUM

Cherimoya
My cherimoya, shortly before it became smoothie fodder.

Archive of past images




AppleBorovinka


Chinquapin

Recent Cultivar Releases
Pomegranate

Current Work in Pomology

StrawbParkerEarle


QuinceBourgeat


Atom Feed

Powered by Blogger

Add to Technorati Favorites

May 8, 2006

John Schmid: Thoughts on apple cultivars

John Schmid sent the following to me a long while ago, before some long-forgotten crisis intervened and I forgot about the blog for an age or two. John has a long career in fruit, having worked for Dave Ferree at Ohio State for nearly three decades, and I'm pleased to have him as both a reader and now contributor. He brings up some good points, to which I have no easy answer:

I was fairly new as a horticulture technician in the late 70's when I had my first encounter with a new apple cultivar called Gala. Up to that time, my favorite apples tended to be 'McIntosh' types. In fact, some of my colleagues thought that the stork had been blown off course; I should have been born in New England.

I was impressed with 'Gala'. Here was an apple that was sweet, but had real flavor. Others in both the research and grower communities were also impressed. The only thing not in favor of the cultivar was its color.

Well-positioned fruit of the original 'Gala' would have a red blush on the exposed side, but vast majority of the fruit on a tree were basically yellow with an orange stripe. So, in those early years the hunt was on for a sport that would produce a better-colored 'Gala'.

As this process was going on, I reflected on the situation. Here we have a superior apple and it has a very unique appearance -- what else could we ask for?

Businesses that manufacture goods go to great lengths to differentiate their products. Remember tail fins on cars? Or hood ornaments? Or logos on pockets? The point is not to make the product better, but to identify one's product in the mind of the customer.

We have that difference built in -- and we want to get a red sport of 'Gala' so it can look like every other apple? It just didn't make sense to me.

In later years, I came to realize that people buying fruit in the supermarket will buy apples based on their appearance, Only a small percentage of shoppers really know one cultivar from another. Thus it is necessary to have a uniformly colored fruit, or it will rot on the shelves.

This fact has also been a problem for 'Melrose', the state apple of Ohio. 'Melrose' is a large blocky apple that has a muddy dark red color over 50-70% of its surface. It is a wonderful multipurpose apple. It has a bright tangy taste, cooks well, and is a good addition to cider. Many people feel that it is the best cultivar for making applesauce.

I have often given people a 'Melrose' to taste. The first response is always, without an exception: "Where can I buy them?" In the supermarket, they don't sell because of their appearance.

What can be done?

The problem really boils down to education. If shoppers could be educated about a cultivar, such as Gala or Melrose; they would want to buy it no matter what it looked like. In fact, a unique appearance would be the advantage I presumed it to be way back in the 70's.

Growers can and do educate their customers at their roadside markets, but that is a very small segment of the market. The effort has to be mass-market advertising to make much of a difference.

I even mentally designed an add campaign for 'Melrose' along the line of: "Yes it's ugly, but boy it tastes good." My inspiration was the old Volkswagen ads for the Beetle that tapped into the love of the underdog in the American people.

Yes, advertising campaigns can be created, but the overriding problem is that there is no money for such an ad campaign. The growers are barely surviving now with international competition. Supermarkets will sell what the customer buys and the customers will buy what the supermarkets have to sell. There seems to be no incentive for anyone who could afford to advertise, to invest the kind of money necessary to promote superior apples. So, many good cultivars come and go without a chance to reach the buying public.

Does anyone have a solution? Comments?


I know I've harped on this before, but why, with all the zillions of cultivars out there (a 1905 publication reported 17,000 apple cultivars) did we wind up with the same 4-7 in every store in every state? And while some are pretty decent (a truly ripe 'Fuji' is a wonderful experience), in general they hardly represent the very best there is out there. With some fruit, there's a barrier in the sense that no one is paying attention to the cultivar name (which is virtually never even available). People go to the store to buy, for example, a peach, not, say, a 'White River' peach. No one wants to be surprised, so there's a certain homogenization that's only natural. But if there was one fruit that could overcome that hurdle, it's apples. People know apple cultivars. Granted, just a handful, but people are aware of the fact there are differences in apple varieties, and they're aware that there are particular ones they like. That's an opportunity to build a market that's not being taken advantage of, or at least not very often. Certainly there have been additions to the elite club that is supermarket apples over the past decade ('Pink Lady', for example) but they are few and far between. As John mentions, American apple growers are taking a beating from international competition. Why not take advantage of the fact that America is home to more apple cultivars than any place on earth, all developed and adapted for conditions here, and build markets for some of the other often forgotten apples. There's been such an effort, on a rather localized basis, with the 'Gravenstein' apple in the Sebestapol area in California. There are literally hundreds of apples worthy of similar campaigns.

I could ramble like this for another page or two, but like I said, I don't know what the solution is either. But the opportunity is there if some one does.

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

At 5/21/2006 06:39:00 PM, Anonymous Matthew said...

Is California different in this respect? Apples are regularly advertised with their cultivar names, which leads me to believe that folks around here know the difference. And Gala seems to be a known 'brand' cultivar.

However, one hardly ever sees peaches or other stone fruits identified with a cultivar name in grocery store adds or displays.

 
At 5/21/2006 09:07:00 PM, Blogger Evil Fruit Lord said...

Maybe I was a little unclear on this aspect. This is exactly the situation here: Apples are regularly advertised by cultivar name, including 'Gala'. Virtually all other fruits however, are not identified by cultivar, and are designated at most by things like 'red' or 'seedless'.

What I was suggesting was that A) other crops should create publically known identities for cultivars, and B) more apple cultivars need to weasel their way into public consciousness. My comment on 'Gravenstein' was based relates to the efforts of a subset of California growers to create an identity for that cultivar, which, from the sounds of it, they've been moderately successful at. (The Sebestapol reference was from memory...I may be wrong about where it was.)

 
At 7/18/2009 01:14:00 AM, Blogger suman said...

You have very good thoughts I am happy to read your message. amazing !!

suman
free satellite tv

 
At 10/09/2015 03:24:00 AM, Blogger Zheng junxai5 said...

2015-10-09 zhengjx
Ralph Lauren UK Sale Polo Shirts
ugg boots
Up To 70% Off Air Retro Jordan 8s
coach factory outlet
Cheap Toms Shoes Outlet Sale Clearance
Louis Vuitton Handbags Factory Outlet
Michael Kors Outlet USA Store
Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet Online
Air Jordan 4 Retro Free Shipping
coach outlet online
michael kors outlet
louis vuitton
Official Cheap Michael Kors Handbags Outlet
New Jordans Cheap For Sale
ralph lauren uk
tory burch outlet
ugg boots
ray-ban sunglasses
Michael Kors Outlet Stores Online
ugg boots
louis vuitton outlet
ugg boots
louis vuitton outlet
canada goose jackets
michael kors outlet
cheap uggs sale
toms shoes
canada goose jackets
uggs outlet
michael kors outlet

 
At 7/03/2016 10:32:00 PM, Blogger 柯云 said...

2016-07-04keyun
louis vuitton purses
coach outlet canada
coach factory outlet online
rolex watches
jordan 3 powder blue
louis vuitton outlet
adidas yeezy
coach outlet store
louis vuitton outlet
ralph lauren sale
nike uk
longchamp handbags
rolex watches
coach outlet
michael kors outlet online
cheap oakleys
ralph lauren
nfl jerseys
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet
beats by dre outlet
louis vuitton bags
louis vuitton purses
adidas running shoes
cheap jordan shoes
michael kors outlet online
hollister clearance
toms wedges
lebron 12
louis vuitton
louis vuitton handbags
jordan retro 13
ray bans
coach outlet clearance
ralph lauren outlet
kobe 8
retro 11
burberry sale

 
At 7/25/2016 11:35:00 PM, Blogger xjd7410@gmail.com said...

louis vuitton handbags
adidas superstar
adidas wings
oakley vault
michael kors outlet
nike huarache
fitflop sandals
polo outlet
oakley sunglasses
michael kors outlet clearance
coach outlet store online clearances
concord 11
cheap jordans
adidas boost
true religion outlet
coach outlet online
nike outlet
jordan retro 13
true religion jeans
gucci handbags
coach outlet
cheap toms
air jordan 8
beats by dr dre
copy watches
replica watches
burberry handbags
coach outlet clearance
christian louboutin sale
chenyingying2016726

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home